Ashburn v. Ashburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a change of circumstances “is not a substantial change if it had been contemplated in the final judgment.”
• reversing order granting downward modification of alimony on ground that wife received $8,000 in proceeds from the sale of marital home because the sale was contemplated in the final judgment of dissolution and was not a substantial change in circumstances.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jaffee v. Jaffee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-03· cited 42×
• Floyd v. Floyd
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-01-07· cited 13×
• Damiano v. Damiano
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-08· cited 10×
• Wolfe v. Wolfe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-28· cited 8×
• Lewis v. Lewis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-25· cited 8×
• Hunt v. Hunt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-04· cited 6×
• MARJORIE GELBER, f/k/a MARJORIE GELBER BRYDGER v. GORDON CHARLES BRYDGER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-06· cited 4×
• Bashaw v. Bashaw
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-14· cited 2×
• Padrick v. Padrick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-27
• Blue v. Blue
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-11
• Housman v. Housman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-17

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Howell v. Howell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-09-27· cited 11×