Ashann-Ra v. Com. of Va.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that DOP 864 does not violates the Due Process Clause by requiring that noncompliant inmates be placed in pretrial detention, and lose all privileges, prior to a hearing
• opining that plaintiff could not satisfy injury element of Eighth Amendment claim because he provided “no facts supporting his bald assertion that stress” from alleged prison condition “made his mental health problems worse”
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a Virginia state prisoner’s negligent infliction of emotional distress claim after dismissing his § 1983 claims
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a Virginia state prisoner’s negligent infliction of emotional distress claim after dismissing his § 1983 claims
• finding prisoner had no constitutional claim for prison officials ignoring his grievances
• same and citing to defendants’ assertions that “female inmates are not as prone to be violent [or] to hide weapons in their hair”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).