Skip to main content
· 11/15/1901

Ash v. Southern Chemical & Fertilizing Co.

Citations

  • 107 La. 311

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The sheriff has a standing in court in a proceeding against an adjudicatee to set aside an adjudication because of non-payment of the amount of the bid.</p> <p>2. Such proceeding may be by rule.</p> <p>3. Where, by the certificate of mortgages read at the sale, there appears to be outstanding special mortgages resting on the property sold, the adjudicatee,</p> <p>. after paying to the sheriff the amount of the writ and costs, may retain in his hands, to satisfy said outstanding mortgages, the surplus of the purchase price.</p> <p>4. The nullity resulting from the sheriff’s failure to announce that the adjudicatee shall have the right to retain in his hands the surplus of the purchase price, as stated in number 3, is relative, and the sheriff is without interest and without standing to invoke the same.</p> <p>5. And, even if the sheriff had such standing, he could not be permitted to urge such nullity in the present proceeding, which is based on the theory of there having been a valid sale of which the adjudicatee has failed to pay the price.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting Rule 12(b)(6) motion dismissing LLC’s claim brought by LLC member
  • declining to apply exception to non-intracorporate dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.