Ash v. Egar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting contracts must “be read as a 28 whole, and every part [must] be interpreted with reference to the whole”
• “A written contract will, if possible, be construed so as to give effect to all its parts.”
• “Interpretation of a contract is a question 18 of law for the court when its terms are unambiguous on its face.”
• “Interpretation of a contract is a question of law for the court when its 26 terms are unambiguous on its face.”
• contracts should be given their plain meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).