Ash v. Daggy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that subject matter jurisdiction challenges may be raised at any time
• holding proceedings conducted or decisions made by a court are legally void when there is an absence of subject matter jurisdiction
• describing Dietz as involving a violation of “a Kansas Corporation Commission regulation requiring drivers hauling hazardous materials to stop, look, and listen at railroad crossings”
• stating subject matter jurisdiction authorizes a 4 court to hear a case
• \There is no private cause of action under the KUTPA.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).