Aseltine v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the legality of recoupment surcharges imposed by insurance companies on certain motor vehicle insurance policyholders
• finding a statement of the North Carolina Legislative Research Commission Report on insurance laws “especially pertinent” to the question of legislative intent
• interpretations that would create a conflict between two or more statutes are to be avoided
• under the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius, statute supplying one procedure for accomplishing an objective necessarily excludes any other procedure
• “statutes should be reconciled with each other when possible . . . .
• “The touchstone of the [Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act] is the presence of a justiciable controversy, where the pleadings demonstrate a real controversy and the need for a declaration of rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).