· 1/11/2012
Asbury Park, LLC v. Greenbriar Estate Homeowners' Ass'n
Citations
- 271 P.3d 1194
- 152 Idaho 338
- 2012 Ida. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial court did not have the authority to adopt Section 6.19 but noting that it was “unclear” whether Section 6.19 was even relevant to the facts of the case
- holding that a trial court did not have the authority to adopt Section 6.19 but noting that it was “unclear” whether Section 6.19 was even relevant to the facts of the case
- stating that 7 the Restatement is not law unless it has been adopted by the Idaho Supreme Court
- district court is obliged to follow Idaho law, rather than restatement, which presumably compiles majority rules
- district court is obliged to follow Idaho law, rather than restatement, which presumably compiles majority rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horton, Burdick, Eismann, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.