Skip to main content
· 1/11/2012

Asbury Park, LLC v. Greenbriar Estate Homeowners' Ass'n

Citations

  • 271 P.3d 1194
  • 152 Idaho 338
  • 2012 Ida. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court did not have the authority to adopt Section 6.19 but noting that it was “unclear” whether Section 6.19 was even relevant to the facts of the case
  • holding that a trial court did not have the authority to adopt Section 6.19 but noting that it was “unclear” whether Section 6.19 was even relevant to the facts of the case
  • stating that 7 the Restatement is not law unless it has been adopted by the Idaho Supreme Court
  • district court is obliged to follow Idaho law, rather than restatement, which presumably compiles majority rules
  • district court is obliged to follow Idaho law, rather than restatement, which presumably compiles majority rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Burdick, Eismann, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.