Skip to main content
· 4/25/2003

Asarco Inc. v. State

Citations

  • 69 P.3d 139
  • 138 Idaho 719
  • 2003 Ida. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that permit limits were invalid because the TMDL was not promulgated as a rule
  • stating an agency action characterized as a rule must be promulgated according to statutory directives for rulemaking in order to have the force and effect of law
  • “[A]n agency action characterized as a rule must be promulgated according to statutory directives for rulemaking in order to have the force and effect of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, Schroeder, Walters, Kidwell, Eismann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.