Skip to main content
· 2/22/2005

A.S. v. Trumbull Board of Education

Citations

  • 359 F. Supp. 2d 102
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying Plaintiff’s request for supplementation because Plaintiff failed to “provide[] the Court with the documents they seek to introduce nor sufficiently describe[] them in a way that would permit the Court to consider Plaintiffs’ motion.”
  • “Because both parties invoke Burlington, the Court (without deciding the issue) accepts the First Circuit's decision as setting forth the proper interpretation of § 1415(e)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.