A.S. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony regarding repair estimate for damaged vehicle should have been stricken where the actual estimates were not admitted into evidence and absent such testimony, there was no competent, substantial evidence demonstrating the element of value
• “Because the actual estimate was not admitted into evidence, the testimony concerning its contents should have been stricken. Without this evidence, the record does not provide competent, substantial evidence demonstrating the essential element of value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bank of New York v. Andrew Calloway
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-07· cited 48×
• Sas v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-17· cited 26×
• B.J.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-12· cited 4×
• T. v. U. v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marrero v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-09-15· cited 39×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-11· cited 19×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-29· cited 16×
• Sunshine Chevrolet Oldsmobile v. UAC
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-23· cited 3×