Skip to main content
· 5/29/1996

Arzel Haley v. Boniface Gross, Lieutenant McKee and Michael Ellis

Citations

  • 86 F.3d 630
  • 44 Fed. R. Serv. 807
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1424
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 12387
  • 1996 WL 280790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no error in admitting photograph of charred body because “(while the photograph [was] certainly disturbing, its contents were highly relevant”
  • deliberate indifference found where prison officer ignored as many as seven complaints by an inmate about his ongoing feud with his cellmate and his. cellmate’s “crazy” and “intimidating” behavior and never checked in on the cellmates
  • deliberate indifference found where prison officer ignored as many as seven complaints by an inmate about his ongoing feud with his cellmate and his cellmate’s “crazy” and “intimidating” behavior and never checked in on the cellmates
  • no abuse of discretion in deliberate indifference case where district court allowed “an expert in the area of corrections and prison management” to “testify regarding what he believed to be the proper response to certain prison situations”
  • applying Farmer, 511 U.S. at 843
  • applying Farmer, 511 U.S. at 843

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.