Arzate v. Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consumers of retail goods and services have standing to sue under the antitrust laws when they suffer a price increase resulting from anti-competitive conduct
• holding that consumers of retail goods and services have standing to sue under the antitrust laws when they suffer a price increase resulting from anticompetitive conduct
• holding that district courts are vested with broad power and discretion in matters of certification and management of class actions
• recognizing that district courts “have broad power and discretion vested in them by Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23”
• recognizing that district courts “have broad power and discretion vested in them by Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23”
• holding that “injury to business or property” was not limited to commercial interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).