Arturo S. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Commissioner, not the courts, must resolve conflicts in the evidence
• holding that substantial evidence can consist of “(1) objective medical facts; (2) diagnoses and opinions of treating and examining physicians; (3) the claimant’s subjective evidence of pain and disability; and (4) his age, education, and work history”
• explaining that courts “may not … reweigh the evidence or try the issues de novo”
• providing that if substantial evidence supports a factual finding, the factual finding is conclusive
• superseded by statute on other grounds, see Stancle v. Colvin, No. 4:15-00405-CAN, 2016 WL 3172784, at , n. 11 (E.D. Tex. June 7, 2016
• superseded by statute on other grounds, see Stancle v. Colvin, No. 4:15-00405-CAN, 2016 WL 3172784, at , n. 11 (E.D. Tex. June 7, 2016)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).