Skip to main content
· 9/21/1972

Artman v. Ray

Citations

  • 501 P.2d 63
  • 263 Or. 529
  • 1972 Ore. LEXIS 431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to take advantage of privilege extended by ORS 19.130(2), alternative claim of trial court error must be asserted in brief, albeit not necessarily raised as a cross-appeal
  • cross-appeal unnecessary if the respondent seeks to sustain the judgment below
  • distinguishing proper use of cross-assignments of error and cross-appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.