Artman v. International Harvester Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the partial performance exception “can operate only to validate a past contract of sale”
• “Although affording buyers a remedy for goods accepted and paid for, section 2–201(3)(c) does not indicate in any way that a delivery of goods shall bind two parties to a complex on-going franchise relationship” (emphasis added)
• dealership or distributorship franchise found to fall under U.C.C.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).