Artisst v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court “was under an obligation to investigate the possibility of juror prejudice by more than a perfunctory poll of the jury”
• affirming because the evidence showed “appellant’s intention to be on the premises contrary to [the owner’s] will”
• “Different procedures and remedies are required for handling an incompetency discovered after trial than for that discovered during trial.”
• university residence facility that was restricted where university identification card was required for access
• juror dishonesty in pretrial voir dire about acquaintance with defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).