Artisan Flooring, Inc. v. Schapiro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relief was not proper under MCR 2.116(C)(1)(f) because the opposing parties’ “rights would be substantially detrimentally affected” if they were forced to relitigate the case when there was “no suggestion” that they engaged in any wrongdoing
• refusing to vacate a judgment based on a change in law when the case “was closed . . . [and] [n]o appeal was pending before this Court or the Supreme Court, no motion was pending before the trial court, and the final judgment in favor of defendants had been entered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).