· 5/22/1990
Artis v. Artis
Citations
- 392 S.E.2d 504
- 10 Va. App. 356
- 6 Va. Law Rep. 2449
- 1990 Va. App. LEXIS 103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, when no explanation is offered as to why parties made changes in language in in-court stipulation, court may presume that inconsistencies therein were unintended and are correctable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.