Skip to main content
· 5/22/1990

Artis v. Artis

Citations

  • 392 S.E.2d 504
  • 10 Va. App. 356
  • 6 Va. Law Rep. 2449
  • 1990 Va. App. LEXIS 103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, when no explanation is offered as to why parties made changes in language in in-court stipulation, court may presume that inconsistencies therein were unintended and are correctable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.