Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 1/18/2017

Arthur West v. Loretta E. Lynch

Citations

  • 845 F.3d 1228
  • 2017 WL 191953
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when an agency prepares an environmental impact statement, “the plaintiff need not allege that, if he were to succeed in enforcing a NEPA-required procedure the defendant agency did not follow, the agency’s substantive policy would change”
  • noting that “redressability focuses on the connection between the alleged injury and the judicial relief requested” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining that, because “‘standing is not dispensed in gross’ but instead may differ claim by claim,” a plaintiff must demonstrate his “standing to pursue” each of his claims
  • explaining that, because “ ‘standing is not dispensed in gross’ but instead may differ claim by claim,” a plain-, tiff must demonstrate his “standing to pursue” each of his claims
  • “[S]tanding is not dispensed in gross but instead may differ claim by claim[.]”
  • “[Standing is not dispensed in gross but instead may differ claim by claim[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Millett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.