D.C. Circuit· 1/18/2017
Arthur West v. Loretta E. Lynch
Citations
- 845 F.3d 1228
- 2017 WL 191953
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 814
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when an agency prepares an environmental impact statement, “the plaintiff need not allege that, if he were to succeed in enforcing a NEPA-required procedure the defendant agency did not follow, the agency’s substantive policy would change”
- noting that “redressability focuses on the connection between the alleged injury and the judicial relief requested” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
- explaining that, because “‘standing is not dispensed in gross’ but instead may differ claim by claim,” a plaintiff must demonstrate his “standing to pursue” each of his claims
- explaining that, because “ ‘standing is not dispensed in gross’ but instead may differ claim by claim,” a plain-, tiff must demonstrate his “standing to pursue” each of his claims
- “[S]tanding is not dispensed in gross but instead may differ claim by claim[.]”
- “[Standing is not dispensed in gross but instead may differ claim by claim[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Millett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election IntegrityD.C. Circuit· 2017-12-26· cited 112×
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2017-06-30· cited 86×
- Gvt. Province of Manitoba v. David BernhardtD.C. Circuit· 2019-05-03· cited 85×
- Abulhawa v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-04· cited 50×
- Banner Health v. Thomas PriceD.C. Circuit· 2017-08-18· cited 39×
- Doris Jeffries v. Volume Services America, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2019-07-02· cited 35×
- American Fuel & Petrochemical v. EPAD.C. Circuit· 2019-09-06· cited 24×
- Griffith v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-10-18· cited 13×
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.D.C. Circuit· 2019-05-24· cited 13×
- Wash. Tennis & Educ. Found., Inc. v. Clark Nexsen, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-08-20· cited 10×
- Thompson v. SessionsDistrict of Columbia· 2017-10-03· cited 9×
- Western Coal Traffic League v. STBD.C. Circuit· 2021-05-28· cited 8×
- Siegel v. U.S. Dep't of the TreasuryD.C. Circuit· 2018-03-28· cited 8×
- Catherine Johnson v. Xavier BecerraD.C. Circuit· 2024-08-09· cited 8×
- Duberry v. Dist. of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2019-05-21· cited 7×
- Health v. PriceDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-21· cited 7×
- Hecate Energy LLC v. FERCD.C. Circuit· 2025-01-21· cited 7×
- Endeley v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-03· cited 6×
- Nyambal v. MnuchinDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-29· cited 5×
- Crimson Galeria Ltd. v. Healthy Pharms, Inc.District of Columbia· 2018-08-21· cited 5×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 3,605×
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 3,172×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,484×
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 1,801×
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 1,301×
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 1,183×
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-06-27· cited 937×
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1996-08-20· cited 631×
- Hettinga v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2012-04-13· cited 588×
- Settles v. United States Parole CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2005-11-08· cited 586×
- Joseph Arpaio v. Barack ObamaD.C. Circuit· 2015-08-14· cited 514×
- National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of EducationD.C. Circuit· 2004-05-14· cited 256×
- Nova Health Systems v. FogartyTenth Circuit· 2005-07-20· cited 250×
- City of Dania Beach v. Federal Aviation AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2007-05-11· cited 89×
- Dynalantic Corp. v. Department of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1997-06-10· cited 79×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.