· 2/4/1943
Arthur v. Witmeyer
Citations
- 39 Ohio Law. Abs. 505
- 53 N.E.2d 915
- 1943 Ohio App. LEXIS 943
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court in Mosley stated that the court in Miranda distinguished the procedural safeguards triggered by a request for counsel and a request to remain silent and had required interrogation to cease until counsel was present only if the accused had in fact requested counsel
- noting that the court in Mosley stated that the court in Miranda distinguished the procedural safeguards triggered by a request for counsel and a request to remain silent and had required interrogation to cease until counsel was present only if the accused had in fact requested counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes, Geiger, Hornbeck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.