Skip to main content
· 2/4/1943

Arthur v. Witmeyer

Citations

  • 39 Ohio Law. Abs. 505
  • 53 N.E.2d 915
  • 1943 Ohio App. LEXIS 943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court in Mosley stated that the court in Miranda distinguished the procedural safeguards triggered by a request for counsel and a request to remain silent and had required interrogation to cease until counsel was present only if the accused had in fact requested counsel
  • noting that the court in Mosley stated that the court in Miranda distinguished the procedural safeguards triggered by a request for counsel and a request to remain silent and had required interrogation to cease until counsel was present only if the accused had in fact requested counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Geiger, Hornbeck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.