Skip to main content
· 6/18/2009

Arthur v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Florida

Citations

  • 569 F.3d 154
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13090
  • 2009 WL 1703151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases holding that partial dependence on MIA expertise means exhaustion is required
  • \[P]laintiffs have suggested no reason other than a violation of the Insurance [Article] that [the insurer] would be liable to them under a claim for money had and received.\
  • “[Plaintiffs have suggested no reason other than a violation of the Insurance [Article] that [the insurer] would be liable to them under a claim for money had and received.”
  • ‘While the law is not indifferent to the abuses plaintiffs allege, plaintiffs have chosen the wrong statute and the wrong forum in which to press their case.”
  • attached at Docket # 28-3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, King, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.