Skip to main content

Arthur v. State

Citations

  • 717 So. 2d 193
  • 1998 WL 637001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an “admittedly vague argument” for an instruction on self-defense in a prosecution for aggravated assault was sufficient
  • holding that an \admittedly vague argument\ for an instruction on self-defense in a prosecution for aggravated assault was sufficient
  • holding “a defendant is entitled to an instruction on his theory of defense ‘however flimsy’ the evidence is which supports that theory”
  • “ ‘Where there is any evidence introduced at trial which supports the theory of the defense, a defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law applicable to his theory of defense when he so requests.’ ” (quoting Bryant v. State, 412 So.2d 347, 350 (Fla.1982))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.