Skip to main content

Arthur v. State

Citations

  • 997 A.2d 899
  • 193 Md. App. 446
  • 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e determine de novo whether there was a constitutional violation ‘by reviewing the law and applying it to the facts of the case.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler, Deborah, Matricciani, Alpert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.