Arthur v. Atkinson Freight Lines Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the federal discovery rules place a duty on a party to turn over not only proper materials of which he is aware, but also those of which he reasonably ought to have been aware” and imposing sanctions accordingly
• under Rule 26(e), plaintiff had duty to produce updated medical records where medical treatment for his alleged injuries was ongoing and affected the claim for damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland), Ltd. v. Coventry First LLC
  S.D. New York· 2012-02-15· cited 87×
• Robbins & Myers, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.
  W.D. New York· 2011-03-21· cited 34×
• Stallworth v. E-Z Serve Convenience Stores
  M.D. Alabama· 2001-02-05· cited 18×
• AVX Corp. v. Cabot Corp.
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-06-18· cited 10×
• Carlson v. Geneva City School District
  W.D. New York· 2011-09-19· cited 10×
• AVX Corp. v. Cabot Corp.
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-08-01· cited 8×
• Hartford Insurance v. General Electric Co.
  D. Rhode Island· 2007-12-07· cited 5×
• Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical
  D. New Hampshire· 2009-11-02· cited 5×
• SER Dr. Todd Tallman, M.D. v. Hon. Susan B. Tucker, Judge
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-02-12· cited 4×