Arthur Tyler v. Betty Mitchell, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not err in declining to address claim first raised in traverse rather than in habeas petition
• holding that district court did not err in declining to address claim first raised in traverse rather than in habeas petition
• holding that an argument first presented in traverse rather than habeas petition “was not properly before the district court, and the district court did not err in declining to address it”
• holding that, where petitioner’s “argument was first presented in [petitioner’s] traverse rather than in his habeas petition, it was not properly before the district court, and the district court did not err in declining to address it”
• noting that an argument first presented in the petitioner’s “traverse rather than in his habeas petition [ ] was not properly before the district court”
• noting that an argument first presented in the petitioner’s “traverse rather than in his habeas petition [] was not properly before the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).