Skip to main content
· 3/4/1966

Arthur Smith v. J. Lauritzen v. Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia, Third-Party

Citations

  • 356 F.2d 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he defender is privileged to respond only to a reasonable belief on his part that he is in imminent danger of bodily harm.”
  • “[T]he defender is privileged to respond only to a reasonable belief on his part that he is in imminent danger of bodily harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs, Kalodner, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.