· 3/4/1966
Arthur Smith v. J. Lauritzen v. Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia, Third-Party
Citations
- 356 F.2d 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he defender is privileged to respond only to a reasonable belief on his part that he is in imminent danger of bodily harm.”
- “[T]he defender is privileged to respond only to a reasonable belief on his part that he is in imminent danger of bodily harm.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Biggs, Kalodner, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.