· 10/28/1970
Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., Appellee
Citations
- 433 F.2d 421
- 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6748
- 3 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8021
- 2 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- black population of Arkansas compared with percentage of blacks in Southwestern Bell’s work force in that state
- violation of Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 with respect to plaintiff class
- denied injunction to enjoin company from violating Title VII because the company’s record over previous three years was “impressive and salutory”; district court to retain jurisdiction
- plaintiff who applied for position with telephone company permitted to litigate (1) the company’s high school diploma requirement despite the fact that he had graduated from high school and (2
- “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is to be accorded a liberal construction in order to carry out the purpose of Congress to eliminate the inconvenience, unfairness and humiliation of racial discrimination”
- injunctive relief denied after voluntary change in employment practices but fees awarded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vogel, Lay, Bright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.