Skip to main content
· 8/29/1989

Arthur R. Borden, Jr. v. Anita Katzman

Citations

  • 881 F.2d 1035
  • 12 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1071
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12914
  • 1989 WL 90054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Declaratory Judgment Act “does not, of itself, confer jurisdiction upon the federal courts; a suit brought under the Act must state some independent source of jurisdiction, such as the existence of diversity or the presentation of a federal question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Edmondson, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.