Skip to main content
· 5/18/1987

Arthur Michael Newman v. United States

Citations

  • 817 F.2d 635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, despite the indictment’s conjunctive language, the district court’s instructions could have led the jury to convict for conspiracy involving a drug carrying a more lenient sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Logan, Seth, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.