ARTHUR LIPPER CORPORATION and Arthur Lipper, III, Petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that scienter is not a necessary element to find a violation of 78o(a) (1)
• argument that injury was only at expense of off-shore funds “ignores that the fraud charged by the SEC was perpetrated in the United States by payments from one registered broker-dealer (Lipper Corp.) to another (IPC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).