Arthur J. McBride v. Gary Soos and Lamar Haney, Individually and as Elkhart County Policemen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a complaint \which charges abuse of the extradition power by noncompliance with applicable law states a cause of action [under sec. 1983]\
• recognizing cause of action under § 1983 for violation of federal and state extradition procedures.
• characterizing UCEA rights as derived from federal law and recognizing § 1983 cause of action for violation of state and federal extradition procedures. Id. at 613
• this court refused to require the appointment of counsel where the issue was whether state officials have abused the extradition power by non-compliance with applicable state and federal law; surely as complex an issue as Caruth presented in this case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).