Skip to main content
· 10/7/1948

Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 21 Cust. Ct. 217
  • 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petitioner who showed ineffective assistance of counsel in initial post-conviction review proceedings had shown “good cause” for a stay and abeyance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ekwall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.