Skip to main content
· 1/4/1990

Arthur H. Smith v. Arnold R. Jago, Supt.

Citations

  • 888 F.2d 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e do not believe that [the witness’] testimony, in light of its dubious credibility . . . would be sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Boggs, Cohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.