· 1/4/1990
Arthur H. Smith v. Arnold R. Jago, Supt.
Citations
- 888 F.2d 399
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e do not believe that [the witness’] testimony, in light of its dubious credibility . . . would be sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Engel, Boggs, Cohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.