Skip to main content
· 5/4/1977

Arthur H. Mathiesen, as Owner of the M/s Bettina v. Panama Canal Company

Citations

  • 551 F.2d 954
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13539
  • 1977 A.M.C. 981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \All relevant testimony is admissible unless some specific rule of evidence excludes it.\
  • “All relevant testimony is admissible unless some specific rule of evidence excludes it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Clark, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.