Skip to main content
· 2/10/1986

Arthur Doty v. Richard Sewall

Citations

  • 784 F.2d 1
  • 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2649
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to “conserve judicial resources, [a court] should decline 6 to reach the other issues” when remanding for other reasons that may impact the additional 7 issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Breyer, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.