· 2/10/1986
Arthur Doty v. Richard Sewall
Citations
- 784 F.2d 1
- 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2649
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to “conserve judicial resources, [a court] should decline 6 to reach the other issues” when remanding for other reasons that may impact the additional 7 issues
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Breyer, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.