Skip to main content
· 1/27/1987

Arthur Davis v. Kay Bryan, Raymond Lopes, Aaron Ment, John D. Brennan and George Bronson

Citations

  • 810 F.2d 42
  • 6 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1354
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a district court should not raise the statute of limitations defense sua sponte if a defendant fails to assert it
  • observing that “[i]f a defendant fails to assert the statute of limitations defense, the district court ordinarily should not raise it sua sponte”
  • observing a Rule 8(c) affirmative defense “must be asserted in a party’s responsive pleading ‘at the earliest possible moment’ and is a personal defense that is waived if not promptly pleaded”’
  • reversible error for court to sua sponte raise affirmative defense of expiration of statute of limitations in deciding motion for summary judgment
  • reversible error for court to sua sponte raise affirmative defense of expiration of statute of limitations in deciding motion for summary judgment
  • “If a defendant fails to assert the statute of limitations defense, the district court ordinarily should not raise it sua sponte”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Cardamone, Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.