Skip to main content
· 5/5/1997

Arthur Calderon, Warden v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Sacramento), Larry Roberts, Real Party in Interest

Citations

  • 113 F.3d 149
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3300
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 5715
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9791

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that district court’s grant of 1 discovery was “inappropriate” when habeas petition contained unexhausted claims
  • holding that discovery concerning unexhausted claims was inappropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Fletcher, Kozinski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.