Arthur C. Payne, Cross-Appellee v. Panama Canal Company, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he dismissal without prejudice of the prior actions on grounds of mootness does not serve as a final adjudication on the merits so as to bar this action”
• petitioner’s claim for backpay decided under 1978 amendments to applicable statute which were enacted while the case was pending on appeal
• immunity of federal public corporation to be determined from legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).