Skip to main content
· 8/8/2014

Arthur Brown, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director

Citations

  • 762 F.3d 454
  • 2014 WL 3893044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We review the denial of funding for investigative or expert assistance for an abuse of discretion.”
  • only “speculation” supported a finding that the evidence sought would be anything but duplicative
  • movant “offered little beyond speculation that the proposed additional investigation would uncover some information different from that [a prior expert] described in her report and affidavit,” which would be submitted to the clemency authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Jolly, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.