Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. Finesilver, Etc., State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the notice of appeal is deficient by reason of … reference to a non-appealable order …, the district court may ignore it and proceed with the case.”
• trial court’s rejection of accounting firm’s asserted privilege not appealable order
• “If the notice of appeal is deficient by reason of . . . reference to a non-appealable order, . . . the district court may ignore it and proceed with the case.”
• “If the notice of appeal is deficient by reason of untimeliness, lack of essential recitals, reference to a non-appealable order, or otherwise, the district court may ignore it and proceed with the case.”
• “If the notice of appeal is deficient by reason of untimeliness, lack of essential recitals, reference to a non-appealable order, or otherwise, the district court may ignore it and proceed with the case.”
• “If the notice of appeal is deficient by reason of untimeliness, lack of essential recitals, reference to a non- appealable order, or otherwise, the district court may ignore it and proceed with the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).