Arthur Allen Hogenson v. Michael W. Hogenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was entitled to postverdict-prejudgment interest on sum of jury verdict plus preverdict interest, rather than merely on sum of jury verdict, as award of preverdict interest was part of compensatory damages
• stating that damages are not ascertainable if they depend on “contingencies or jury discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).