Arter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a challenge to evidence is waived where an appellate brief fails to “specifically identify which evidence [the defendant] deems improper” and makes “only a general complaint”
• holding that where an appellate brief fails to “specifically identify which evidence [the defendant] deems improper” and makes “only a general complaint,” the defendant waives the issue for appellate review.
• concluding that hearsay testimony regarding identification at a suppression hearing was properly admitted
• holding that this court will “refuse to speculate about which pieces of evidence [an appellant] may find objectionable” where the appellant’s brief “fails to specifically identify which evidence he deems improper” and makes only a “general complaint”
• finding unconstitutional a statute enhancing criminal sentences for gang members without requiring a nexus between gang status and the underlying crime
• trial court did not err by admitting expert testimony “in the field of gang identification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).