Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Entertainment Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the sale of 2,000 t-shirts per year was not sufficient to show wide dissemination
• holding that the sale of 2000 t-shirts did not constitute wide dissemination
• holding that the sale of 2,000 t-shirts did not constitute wide dissemination
• holding evidence that the plaintiff sold 2,000 t-shirts per year and displayed its design at county fairs and on the internet was insufficient to show widespread dissemination
• indicating that “direct survey evidence of purchaser perception is not 10 required”
• declining to 20 address remaining two elements after concluding “that a reasonable jury could not find that Art Attack’s trade dress has acquired secondary meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).