Skip to main content
· 7/27/1920

Arroyo v. Vicario

Citations

  • 28 P.R. Dec. 804
  • 1920 PR Sup. LEXIS 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the federal act clearly requires the object to be mail matter in the custody of the United States Postal Service
  • holding that the federal act clearly requires the object to be mail matter in the custody of the United States Postal Service
  • holding that the federal act clearly requires the object to be mail matter in the custody of the United States Postal Service
  • holding that the federal act clearly requires the object to be mail matter in the custody of the United States Postal Service
  • holding that the federal act clearly requires the object to be mail matter in the custody of the United States Postal Service
  • finding the proceedings null and void where the sole specification failed to state an offense, dismissing the charges but not referencing another trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aso, Asociado, Concurrentes, Del, Hutcmson, Sres, Toro, Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.