Arroyo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s claim that he would not have entered into a plea if his trial counsel had correctly informed him about the possible penalties that he faced stated a facially sufficient claim for postconviction relief
• reversing denial of 3.850 motion where order did not include record attachments to refute claim that trial court failed to a elicit factual basis for the crime to which defendant entered plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-17· cited 7×
• Sherwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-15· cited 5×
• Galindo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sirmons v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-06-24· cited 29×
• Franklin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 9×