· 4/26/1962
Arrowsmith v. United Press International
Citations
- 205 F. Supp. 56
- 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Channeling work through a lawyer rather than having non[]legal personnel 3 perform it does not provide a basis for claiming attorney-client privilege.”
- “Channeling work through a lawyer rather than having non[]legal personnel perform it does not provide a basis for claiming attorney-client privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.