Arrow Overall Supply Company v. Peloquin Enterprises

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defense that no arbitration agreement existed can be raised after deadline because it was a direct attack on arbitrator’s jurisdiction
• holding defense that no arbitration agreement existed can be raised after deadline because it was a direct attack on arbitrator’s jurisdiction
• “The existence of a contract to arbitrate and the enforceability of its terms is a judicial question which cannot be decided by an arbitrator.”
• “The existence of a contract to arbitrate and the enforceabil ity of its terms is a judicial question which cannot be decided by an arbitrator.”
• Under Michigan law, “[t]he existence of a contract to arbitrate and the enforceability of its terms is a judicial question which cannot be decided by an arbitrator.”
• “ ‘Arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.’ ... It follows that a valid agreement must exist for arbitration to be binding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).