Arrow-Hart, Inc. v. Philip Carey Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting former Fed. R. Civ. P. 63, similar to current Washington CR 63
• \... we hold that a new trial is required and that Judge Siler was correct in his construction of Rule 63.\
• “... we hold that a new trial is required and that Judge Siler was correct in his construction of Rule 63.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).