Skip to main content
· 12/10/2010

Arrow Gear Co. v. Downers Grove Sanitary District

Citations

  • 629 F.3d 633
  • 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20045
  • 71 ERC (BNA) 2089
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25220
  • 2010 WL 5020089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] decision is not final for purposes of appellate jurisdiction if the court rendering it has dismissed one or more of the plaintiff’s claims, or one or more of the defendants, with leave to refile.”
  • “[Appellant’s] maneuver, if allowed, would prevent the entirety of the contested issues, involving all the parties, from being resolved in a single appeal; it would exemplify piecemeal appealing, which is disfavored in the federal court system.”
  • “Arrow could have asked the judge to enter a final judgment under Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.