Skip to main content
· 1/15/1852

Arrington v. Washington

Citations

  • 14 Ark. 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing discovery to confirm representations by the awardee that its primary place of business was within a HUBZone where the administrative record contained multiple addresses for the awardee
  • “[T]he administrative record may be supplemented when the agency allegedly failed to consider information relevant to its final decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.